# .font: font.text_2
# .autowrap: false
# .centered: true
cso208 remix - shredderfly
# .font: font.text_1
by
# .font: font.text_2
nesdori
# .centered: false

# .font: font.value_1
# .autowrap: false
NESDORI                           2021-12-02 18:20
# .font: font.value_2
# .autowrap: true
dustin, SO, IS MY ASSUMPTION CORRECT AND BOTH OF YOUR SOLUTIONS WON'T WORK HERE? :)

# .font: font.value_1
# .autowrap: false
DUSTIN                            2021-12-02 18:59
# .font: font.value_2
# .autowrap: true
nesdori, ABSOLUTELY! AND ALSO MY GUESS WAS CORRECT THAT YOU WOULD UPLOAD EXACTLY THIS REMIX! :D

# .font: font.value_1
# .autowrap: false
DUSTIN                            2021-12-02 19:30
# .font: font.value_2
# .autowrap: true
ANOTHER FUN FACT: EVEN THOUGH I HAVEN'T FIGURED OUT THIS REMIX YET, I CAN ALREADY TELL THAT THERE'S NO NEED TO CHANGE THE SEQUEL AT ALL :D

# .font: font.value_1
# .autowrap: false
DUSTIN                            2021-12-02 19:45
# .font: font.value_2
# .autowrap: true
POOR BUTTERFLY... IN MY SOLUTION IT SAW THE DAYLIGHT ONE MORE AT LEAST... ;D  
  
COOL! IF I HAD SEEN THIS BEFORE, I WOULD PROBABLY HAVE CHOSEN THIS VARIANT BECAUSE (A) IT'S HARD TO PREVENT THIS SOLUTION ANYWAY, (B) IT'S A VERY NICE DESIGN (NICER THAN MINE WITH THE TWO | ONE OF WHICH IS USELESS ANYWAY) AND (C) THIS REMIX FITS VERY WELL WITH MY SEQUEL BECAUSE BOTH SOLUTIONS HAVE LESS IN COMMON THAN MY ORIGINAL AND THE SEQUEL :D  
  
PERHAPS I'LL CHANGE ORDERING AND UPLOAD THE SEQUEL NEXT ;)

# .font: font.value_1
# .autowrap: false
DUSTIN                            2021-12-02 19:45
# .font: font.value_2
# .autowrap: true
*ONCE MORE

# .font: font.value_1
# .autowrap: false
DUSTIN                            2021-12-05 17:11
# .font: font.value_2
# .autowrap: true
MY RUN FREE! I ACTUALLY LIKE THIS SOLUTION SLIGHTLY BETTER THAN MY INTENDED ONE :D